Saudi judge sentences pregnant gang-rape victim to 100 lashes

Saudi judge sentences pregnant gang-rape victim to 100 lashes for committing adultery
By Liz Hazelton, 11th February 2009

A Saudi judge has ordered a woman should be jailed for a year and receive 100 lashes after she was gang-raped, it was claimed last night.

The 23-year-old woman, who became pregnant after her ordeal, was reportedly assaulted after accepting a lift from a man.

He took her to a house to the east of the city of Jeddah where she was attacked by him and four of his friends throughout the night.

A judge in the Saudi city of Jeddah, pictured, ruled that the woman was guilty of adultery and should be jailed for a year.

She later discovered she was pregnant and made a desperate attempt to get an abortion at the King Fahd Hospital for Armed Forces.

According to the Saudi Gazette, she eventually ‘confessed’ to having ‘forced intercourse’ with her attackers and was brought before a judge at the District Court in Jeddah.

He ruled she had committed adultery - despite not even being married - and handed down a year’s prison sentence, which she will serve in a prison just outside the city.

She is still pregnant and will be flogged once she has had the child.

The Saudi Arabian legal system practices a strict form of medieval law. Women have very few rights and are not even allowed to drive.

They are also banned from going out in public in the company of men other than male relatives.

Islamic terrorism

---

Heybrook, then and now

Heybrook primary school, then and now.

The British have ONE country to call their own, just ONE home, and this is what the insanity of muti-cult-ism has done to that home. Turned it into a melting pot of ethnic diversity, given the British ONE home land away, to foreign invasion.

Its a crying shame, a crying shame.

Obama in Deep Submission

US President Barack Obama greets King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia

Obama in Deep Submission to Saudi Arabian King Abdullah

By Sean Osborne Thursday, April 2, 2009

Thank the Lord that Barack Obama is an usurper president and not a real President of these United States, for if he were then the above clickable image of the deep head and bended-knee bow of submission (Islam) before King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia would be the surest sign that his “my Muslim faith” gaffe comment in front of the whole nation while a guest on George Stephanopoulos ‘This Week’ television program was no gaffe at all.

Photo: US President Barack Obama, center, back to camera, greets King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, center, before the official G20 leaders group photo with Britain’s Queen Elizabeth II at London’s Buckingham Palace, Wednesday, April 1, 2009. (AP Photo/John Stillwell/pool)

Update: See…

A Tale of Two Bows, starring Barack Obama

Barack Obama paid his respects to two very different monarchs.

Watch the American President give a slight head nod to the UK’s Queen Elizabeth, and then practically touch the toes of Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah.

More...

Sharia Law - Obama thinks its "important" to respect local culture & women

Unfortunately those two don't go together in Islam...

From:http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/04/04/afghanistan.womens.rights/index.html?iref=topnews

KABUL, Afghanistan (CNN) -- Amid mounting pressure from the West, Afghan President Hamid Karzai says his government will review a recently approved version of a law that critics say legalizes marital rape and the U.S. president has called "abhorrent."

Recently approved version of law also mandates that a woman ask a male relative to leave the house.

"We understand the concerns of our allies in the international community," Karzai told reporters Saturday.
The minister of justice would study the draft, he said.
"If there is anything that is of concern to us then we will definitely take action in consultation with our [religious clerics] and send it back to the parliament," Karzai said. "This is something that we are also serious about and we should not allow."
Karzai's news conference was in response to a series of news reports by Western media since the president signed the law last month.
He specifically mentioned a March 31 story by London-based The Independent, which called the law "a massive blow for women's rights" and cited critics who said Karzai "rushed" the bill through parliament in hopes of appeasing Islamic fundamentalists ahead of August elections.
Human rights groups and news reports consistently refer to a report from the U.N. Development Fund for Women which reportedly stated that the legislation -- a piece of sharia law, or Islamic law -- that affects the Shiite community in the predominantly Sunni nation "legalizes the rape of a wife by her husband" by allowing men to force sexual intercourse on their spouses.

Shiites make up roughly 10 percent of Afghanistan's population.
Western leaders attending a NATO conference Saturday also signaled their disapproval of the legislation.
"I think this law is abhorrent," U.S. President Obama said in Strasbourg, France. "We think that it is very important for us to be sensitive to local culture, but we also think that there are certain basic principles that all nations should uphold, and respect for women and respect for their freedom and integrity is an important principle."
French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel agreed, with the latter saying, "We very much hope that the draft piece of legislation is to be withdrawn."
The law was drafted by Afghanistan's conservative lawmakers after spending more than a year off and on the parliament's daily agenda. Shia Muslims have been practicing their form of Islam for centuries in Afghanistan, but this law allows them to preserve their identity among the majority Sunni population, one parliamentarian said.
Among its provisions are that women must ask a male relative to leave the house.
"What my fear is, women and children of Afghanistan are always the victims of political games," Afghan lawmaker Fawzia Koofi told CNN in a recent interview. "I mean, they don't have a gun to fight, they cannot create a mess."
Koofi, and other critics of the law, hope that the supreme court will rule that the legislation is at odds with the Afghan constitution, which promises equal rights to all citizens -- male or female.
Still, despite the international outcry against the bill, many in Afghanistan remain unaware of it. Support can be found among those who do, especially the Shiite population.
"Shia people are in Afghanistan," Shia resident Mohammad Zahir said. "They are a part of Afghanistan and there needs to be a law that they go by and follow."

10 Reasons to get rid of the European Union

http://islamophobesunited.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/ten-reasons-to-get-rid-of-the-european-union/

Designer white trash babies

Madonna the disgusting excuse for a "mother" goes and tries to adopt a black little toddler as a substitute for a "designer handbag". The kid has a living father, its not an orphan... disgusting! We are teaching black people well aren't we? In years go come, we'll see little white designer handbags hanging off rich black people. I'm sure we'll think its "cute" then too...

Obama ashamed of America

Obama basically tells Europe he is ashamed to be an American, conceding that it (America) has been dirisive, arrogant and some other word in its relationships with Europe. Not appropriate Obama!

I am not surprised and nor should any American. Starstruck Americans who voted for this clown did not bother checking Obama's background before voting for him. It was freely available on the internet and in the media. He's an American hating, self deprecating traitor who basically can't stand anything America stands for. His wife is even worse. They have no place in the white house and there should be no place in government for politicians who do not love their own country.

Geert Wilders Comes to America

By FrontPage MagazineFrontPageMagazine.com Wednesday, April 01, 2009
Good minds are studied; great minds are prosecuted. If this historical dictum holds true, then Geert Wilders is a modern great mind.
The Dutch parliamentarian and leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV) currently faces trial in his native Amsterdam for “hate crimes” and incitement, for the sin of quoting the Koran’s less flattering passages in his groundbreaking film, Fitna. (Click here to view it online.) His film explores the religious roots of Islamic terrorism on the national and individual level. He considers the Koran the blueprint for a totalitarian theocracy, telling the Hudson Institute last year, “Sure, there are a lot of moderate Muslims. But a moderate Islam is non-existent.”
Although he lives under constant threat of death – a threat made all-too-real to his fellow Dutchmen Pim Fortuyn and Theo van Gogh, both liberal-minded critics of Mohammedanism – he faces persecution for inciting his own peril. In addition to the Dutch trial, French “human rights activists” – in particular one Yassine Bouzrou – are suing Wilders for stating that many Parisian neighborhoods are “no-go areas for women without head scarves” and calling the 2005 riots a “Muslim intifada.” (FrontPage Magazine has noted the disturbing worldwide incidence of Muslim gang-rape, as well as Muslim riots in Paris.) The umpteenth French collaboration followed on the heels of the Kingdom of Jordan charging Wilders with blasphemy last summer. Another kingdom, Great Britain, denied Wilders entry in February. After he had been invited to screen Fitna before the House of Lords, his invitation was withdrawn under Muslim protest. When he arrived in the UK, he was detained for hours, then ejected from the country.
Wilders, already of consequence for his defense of freedom, may attain another historical distinction: he may become the first man convicted for expressing the dominant view of his own country. FrontPage Magazine’s Jacob Laksin has noted Wilders’ policies include support for “restricting immigration from Muslim countries; for more aggressively monitoring domestic extremism, including radical mosques; and for reducing an indulgent welfare state that allows immigrants to live comfortably without assimilating” – all positions gaining ground as the traditionally tolerant land witnesses increasing physical assaults upon its homosexual population. It is precisely his homeland’s tradition of secularism and tolerance he wishes to uphold, as he takes up his newest battle: repealing EU hate speech laws.
Despite his being on trial for allegedly offending his nation’s conscience, polls show if elections were held today, the PVV would win between one-fifth and one-quarter of the Netherlands’ 150 seats.
His stance – speaking out although it means traveling with a hefty contingent of security – has won him acclaim on both sides of the Atlantic. FrontPage Magazine selected Wilders as its 2008 Man of the Year. He eschews personal glory, telling FrontPage in an interview, “Speaking out boldly cost me my personal liberty, with 24-hour security and police protection for more than four years now…I am no hero but I would rather be killed for what I say and believe than submit in silence to Islamic totalitarianism.”
It is not everyday Americans have the opportunity to meet someone charged with thoughtcrime, but they will have just that opportunity this weekend, as the David Horowitz Freedom Center and the International Free Press Society (IFPS) welcome the man London turned away. DHFC and IFPS will bring Wilders, one of the most outspoken defenders of free speech, for his first visit to the West Coast this weekend, April 4-5. On Saturday, April 4, he will speak at Chapman University. Then, from 6:30-10 p.m., the Freedom Center will bring in the fearless MP for a dinner, the California premier of Fitna, and a keynote speech in Beverly Hills. His tour will commence from 10 a.m.-noon on Sunday, April 5, in Los Angeles.
Tickets are available from Stephanie Knudson: Stephanie@horowitzfreedomcenter.org, or by calling (818) 849-3470, extension 209. Due to security, advanced registration and pre-payment are required.
Those on the frontlines of the battle against totalitarianism are rare; opportunities to hear from and assist those directly under fire for their stance is rarer yet. This weekend affords the keepers of freedom’s flame an historic opportunity.

Too Many Humans ...

Brishen Hoff writes: Unless earth is hit by a massive meteor, we will be vastly overpopulated for well over 40 years even if everyone is immediately sterilized. This means we will experience a die-off and more species extinctions. I suggest that earth's sustainable population is only 2,500,000.

Yes, that's million, not billion. If you think that is extremely low, think again. That is over 7 times the current population of all great apes (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutans) combined! That is 10 times earth's population that persisted for the majority of our 2 million year human history! Perhaps if you think 2.5 million is too low for a global sustainable human population you are underestimating:

A) the scale to which we convert land into food using non-renewable fossil fuels
B) how much we've already permanently degraded earth's carrying capacity
C) how unsustainable our current "6th Mass Extinction" is

My estimate of 2.5 million as a sustainable global population is based on a viable hunter-gatherer population 10,000 years ago (when our numbers forced us into the low EROEI lifestyle of agriculture) of 5 million. I adjusted 5 million to 2.5 million because I believe our carrying capacity has been permanently degraded by at least 50%. There aren't as many species left and much of our land is now polluted, deforested, paved, infertile, etc. I think it is important to have a low enough population that a high EROEI hunter-gatherer culture is viable for all who desire it.

How badly we are overpopulated in the next 40 years depends on what we do. Quinacrine sterilization has great potential and offers real hope for a brighter future. Without harming anyone we can ensure maximum speed of population decline (which we already know is slower than desired) using Quinacrine sterilization which would have to be mutually-agreed upon by the majority and enforced just like other laws (eg: everyone has to pay taxes).

http://solutions.synearth.net/2009/02/09

Who gains from population growth?

Posted February 23rd, 2008 by admin

• population

The ideal family for a stable sustainable population size would be two children per couple, with fair conditions to rear them. Actual family sizes however depend upon the psychology of population and the luck of the game, sometimes claimed to be the Will of God.

Who think they gain from population growth?

1. In developed countries, Governments and commercial interests in developed countries seek continual growth of mass markets, increasing consumption, a prosperous building industry, rising prices for real estate, and docile labor pools. They fear supporting ageing populations (See Fact Sheet 8). However, Government funding of babies is most likely to encourage fertility at the welfare-receiving end of the socio-economic scale, where larger families may not receive a fair chance in life.

Western nations’ pronatalist policies for their own countries is scandalous in face of overseas soaring distress of overpopulation beyond resources. National pronatalism is economically wrong because even with the most open of doors, the West could not contain the rising tides of economic refugees from the South. Imagine Australia taking in the overflow of millions, not dozens or hundreds, from Indonesia, PNG, East Timor, the Solomon Islands and other brimming islands of the Pacific. There are even more millions in Africa, the Middle East, Latin America and the smaller nations of the Indian subcontinent.

Vested interests may promote complacency about economic refugees because they can become low-paid labor in developed countries, including as seasonal workers, laid off when not wanted.

National pronatalism is also politically wrong because the West cannot promote family planning for the poor countries without being seen as horribly hypocritical and arousing cries of ‘genocide’.

2. In the worst hotspots of the world, populations are soaring, because of as well as in spite of failed statehood, social and economic chaos, wars, massacres, AIDS and famines.

Throughout history and folklore, the poor are burdened with more children than they can raise, as well as with the distress of no children.

Where there is no social security and child deathrates have traditionally been high, it makes sense to have many children, in the hope that some at least will survive to help support their parents. Increasingly states as well as families are depending on remittances from their children working abroad (as with Tonga and the Philippines). And children can be the greatest joy in life – and they may be the only joy the poor can have. Where women have access to education and family planning, they show their desire for smaller families, that they can cope with.

3. Religious and political outbreeding rivalries. Religious dogmatism overlooks that the first supposed commandment of God, to increase and multiply, is now the only divine commandment that has been fully obeyed, and now it is time to obey the other commands, about loving neighbours and so on. Religions and politics that foster outbreeding their rivals increase the hate and fear in the world as well as the scandal of using ,more children as ‘our weapons’. Influential American fundamentalism cares more for the unborn embryo than for the living child, and cares not for earthly future.

4. Providing food aid and policing for poor nations may even serve particular interests among the donor nations and aid organizations. This too is a problem that must be faced. But it is becoming increasingly clear, especially in Africa and among Australia’s neighbours that however generous the aid and the policing, they will be unable to solve population growth, or even keep up with its increasing needs.

It would seem that one of the two sanest things that humans could do to try to save the planet would be to redirect most financing of armaments to the education of women, supplying access to family planning, and helping states to become economically secure. (The other sane thing is reducing the footprint on the earth that currently accompanies rises in standard of living.) What are the forces that not only prevent this, but actively prevent such campaigning?

Capitalism has raised living standards through the whole world, and the poorest now wear T-shirts, not rags, but it must find a way to operate without requiring continual growth and consumption, seeking growing mass-markets and cheap labor.

http://candobetter.org/FactSheets/WhoGains

Immigration is no solution to an ageing population

Áine Ní Chonaill, spokesperson for the Irish immigration reduction organisation Immigration Control Platform, debunks one of the more popular myths about immigration:

Immigrants are no fix for an aging society

The Irish Times
10 August 2004

One of the great myths regarding immigration is that the aging profile of Europe will require large-scale immigration if the dependency ratio is not to become a big problem.

An excellent book, Do We Need Mass Immigration?, by Anthony Browne (published by Civitas, £6.00), deals, one by one, with the arguments of mass immigrationists and what he has to say on this point is of particular interest. The idea is known as “replacement immigration” and is more and more put forward as an unquestionable scientific law by pundits and by media.

Browne said this is “one of the most widespread and comforting self-delusions since humanity believed the sun went round the earth”. It is, he said, refuted by elementary demographics: immigrants are no fix for an ageing society because they age too.

More here

Overloading Australia - new book about Australia's overpopulation problem

Posted July 23rd, 2008 by Sheila Newman

Finally, something sensible and well-written to counteract the marketing horrors of the growth merchants. MarkO'Connor and Bill Lines’s next prose book on the topic Overloading Australia is due out in late 2008 from Enviro Books, Australia. O'Connor hass co-authored with William Lines (whose latest book is Patriots, a history of the Australian conservation movements).

Here is a collation of extracts:

Extracts from Overloading Australia :

• Colin Clark and the myths of growth economics
• The Monbiot Fallacy
• The Replacement Rate Fallacy

http://candobetter.org/node/679

Imagine Turkey in the European Union

YES WE CAN!

Turkey is a Muslim country where honor killings of women who "embarrass" their men still exists. If you're a man in Islam, and your woman embarrasses you, say, because she was seen "talking" to a strange man, you can kill her, as sanctioned by Islam. Few Islamic women see any problem with this, as it is "Allah's will".

When Turkey joins the EU, Muslims will have free passage to move all around Europe without a passport including the United Kingdom spreading their "religion of peace". This influx of Muslims into the European Union will mean that the percentage of Muslims in Europe will start pushing towards 50 per cent of the total European population; and Europe will essentially become Muslim. As Muslims breed like rabbits because their women and young girls have no choice whether they have sex or not, the takeover jihad will happen sooner than later.

Australia's Young Australian of the Year - A Muslim as well as a Cocaine trafficer!

Article from: The Australian
A FORMER NSW Young Australian of the Year sobbed at her arrest for supplying cocaine, saying "I am supposed to be a role model", a Sydney court has been told.Giving evidence in the NSW District Court, Inspector Steven Patton contradicted Iktimal Hage-Ali's testimony that she did not use those words. The 24-year-old is suing the state of NSW, claiming she was wrongfully arrested and detained in Sydney on November 6, 2006. The arrest occurred eight days before Ms Hage-Ali, a member of former prime minister John Howard's Muslim Community Reference Group, was named NSW Young Australian of the Year, a title she later relinquished. She was released without charge, hours after her arrest, having told police she was a cocaine user but had never supplied the drug. Ms Hage-Ali, who gave evidence last December, was not present in court on Wednesday for her case, which resumed earlier this week. Under questioning from Peter Boder QC, for the state of NSW, Insp Patton said he had spoken to Ms Hage-Ali at the police station after her arrest. "She was crying, she also said, `I'm supposed to be a role model, I'm a finalist in the NSW Young Australian of the Year','' he said. "As she was saying this she was sobbing, and said, `I spoke at your multicultural day, how embarrassing, you must have all been laughing'.'' Ms Hage-Ali has denied making those statements. Insp Patton said that before her arrest he believed police had evidence that showed she was a "very low level'' supplier. "Was she a person who ought to have been arrested?'' Mr Boder asked. Insp Patton replied, "Yes'', but added that after her interview he had found her to be credible when she said she had not supplied cocaine and only bought the drug for her own use. The hearing is continuing before Judge Michael Elkaim.

This article is from Guy White. Head on over to Guy's website to check out some great articles.

The Meaning of Diversity

January 27, 2009 by guywhite

Yesterday I had the misfortune to stumble upon the Colbert Report for a minute and this is what I hear: “Republican are trying to increase diversity. Mitt Romney is both Anglo and Saxon.”

Colbert uses his air time to mock anyone he perceives as a conservative with his fake conservative act.

As I’ve written several times before, this is one more example of whites - in this case those of English descent - not being “diversity”.

Diversity is a positive word used in reference to minorities.

Whites are “gentrification”, a negative word used to mean destruction of a vibrant, beautiful culture.

Any time non-whites move into a neighborhood, they are bringing in “diversity “. This magic diversity will somehow (not sure how since liberals only state conclusions, never reasons) bring more competitiveness and better neighbor relations.

When white “gentrification” moves in, they are just destroying the local culture. As noted before, whites have no culture according to multiculturalists, just as Jews did not have a culture according to the Nazis.

Interestingly, when “diversity” results in massive business bankruptcies in the neighborhood instead of additional competitiveness, and when neighbor relations become terrible and people seize to cooperate completely, we can never bring up the fact that this coincided with “diversity”.

We just move to a new neighborhood and preach to them about the great benefits of diversity to the people and businesses. And they will embrace diversity, whether they like it or not.

http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2008/07/30/whos-the-real-fascist/